Harvard University is confronting a significant challenge to its academic culture as a new report from its Office of Undergraduate Education reveals that 60% of all undergraduate grades are now A's. The findings have sparked a campus-wide debate over academic standards and the value of a Harvard degree.
The 25-page report, distributed to faculty and students, describes the current grading system as “damaging the academic culture of the College.” It highlights a 35% increase in the proportion of A grades awarded over the past two decades, prompting administrators to call for urgent reforms to restore meaning and consistency to academic evaluations.
Key Takeaways
- A report from Harvard's Office of Undergraduate Education found that 60% of undergraduate grades are A's.
- This represents a 35% increase in A grades compared to 20 years ago.
- Administrators and faculty express concern that grades no longer accurately reflect student performance.
- Proposed solutions include introducing A+ grades, reporting median class grades, and reemphasizing in-person exams.
Administration Raises Concerns Over Academic Standards
The report from the Office of Undergraduate Education serves as a stark acknowledgment of a long-simmering issue at the prestigious institution. Dean of Undergraduate Admissions Amanda Claybaugh, who authored the report, conveyed the deep unease among faculty.
“Nearly all faculty expressed serious concern,” Claybaugh wrote, noting a consensus that grades are failing to represent the actual quality of student work. She emphasized that the problem extends beyond simple inflation to fundamental inconsistency.
“Grading is … also too inconsistent, as students have observed. More importantly, our grading no longer performs its primary functions and is undermining our academic mission.”
This sentiment is echoed by external education watchdogs. Veronica Bryant, an academic affairs fellow at the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, warns that the trends at Harvard could have a ripple effect across the nation's higher education landscape.
“‘As goes Harvard, so goes the nation’ is a phrase for a reason,” Bryant stated. “If other schools see America’s oldest and most prestigious university as weakening standards, why should they keep high standards, especially as they compete for fewer and fewer students?”
By the Numbers
60% of all undergraduate grades at Harvard are A's. This is a 35% increase from two decades ago. The report suggests this trend devalues high achievement and makes it difficult to distinguish exceptional work.
A Push for Meaningful Reforms
In response to the growing crisis, the administration is not just identifying the problem but also actively proposing solutions. The report outlines several key measures aimed at recalibrating the university's grading system.
Redefining Excellence and Consistency
One primary recommendation is for instructors to provide clearer definitions for what constitutes A-level work versus B-level work. The goal is to create more uniform standards across different sections of the same course, addressing a common student complaint about grading disparities among teaching fellows.
A faculty committee is also exploring two significant changes to the grading structure itself:
- Introducing A+ Grades: This would allow instructors to award a limited number of A+ marks to recognize truly exceptional performance, helping to differentiate the highest achievers.
- Reporting Median Grades: The committee is considering adding the median grade for each course to student transcripts. This would provide context for an individual's grade, showing how their performance compares to their peers.
Combating AI and Reinstating In-Person Exams
The report also directly addresses the challenges posed by artificial intelligence. It strongly advocates for the reintroduction of in-person, proctored exams, arguing they are a vital tool for assessing genuine student knowledge in an era of advanced AI tools. This move aims to ensure that grades reflect a student's own understanding and analytical skills.
The National Picture
Grade inflation is not unique to Harvard. Studies across American higher education have shown a steady rise in average GPAs over the past several decades. Critics argue this trend devalues diplomas and makes it harder for employers and graduate schools to assess candidates accurately. Harvard's public effort to address the issue could set a new precedent for other elite universities.
Faculty and Students Weigh In
The conversation on campus is multifaceted, with faculty, students, and alumni offering diverse perspectives on the causes and potential solutions. Harvey Mansfield, a retired Harvard professor, offered a pointed critique of the university's academic culture.
“The principle of merit used to get into Harvard is abandoned once there,” Mansfield wrote in The Harvard Crimson.
He argued that students often prioritize extracurricular activities to build their resumes, relegating academics to a secondary concern. Mansfield also suggested that a 2008 policy requiring faculty participation in course evaluations inadvertently encouraged professors to give higher grades to receive more favorable reviews.
Student responses have been varied. A series of editorials in the student newspaper showed that while there is widespread agreement that grade inflation is a problem, there is no consensus on the proposed fixes. Some students applauded the call for higher standards, while others suggested that eliminating general education requirements would be a more effective reform.
A student group, the Intellectual Vitality Initiative, co-led by Jack Flanigan, Edward Hall, and Ari Kohn, noted a breakdown in mutual expectations. They stated that the academic culture has eroded, as “faculty maintain low expectations for students’ effort, while students expect little of their professors in return.”
The Path Forward
While the report has successfully ignited a critical conversation, the implementation of any changes remains a complex task. The administration's willingness to publicly confront the issue is seen by some as a positive first step.
Veronica Bryant believes that if Harvard commits to authentic reform, it could lead a national movement toward greater academic integrity. “Gen Z values authenticity. We hope they will take steps to ensure grades actually reflect student performance, not just reduce the number of A’s,” she said. “If Harvard makes this bold move, others may follow their lead.”
The university now faces the challenge of translating this report into concrete policy. The decisions made in the coming months will not only shape the academic experience for future Harvard students but could also influence the direction of higher education across the country.





